Narnia Declawed

A few years back it was believed that HarperCollins, publishers of the Narnia books, meant to rewrite them and remove all evidence of Christian allegory. This was not true, but it does makes one think:

What would the stories be like without the Christian influence?

Here’s my attempt:

Once there were four children whose names were Peter–oh, wait, he was a disciple. Keys to the kingdom and all that.

Well, then: Once there were four children whose names were Percy, Susan–oops, that name’s based on the Biblical Susanna. And wasn’t there a Santa Lucia, too?

So: Once there were four children whose names were Percy, Sybil, Edmund, and Lana.

Moving right along, these four kids entered a magical land via armoire. There they became involved in an epic struggle of good versus evil–oh, wait, there’s no such thing as absolutes. No one is all evil. The Witch is just misunderstood. She probably had an unhappy childhood. Oh, and we can’t keep calling her the Witch. The implies censure. We’ll call her pagan–no, that might remind people that there’s an opposite to paganism, such as religion. Ah! We’ll call her a Child of Nature.

So, these four kids join forces with the local inhabitants and try to overthrow the Witch–er, Child of Nature (despite her very stable and mutually beneficial reign.) However, lacking any true leadership (That would mean Him, and we certainly can’t include Him.), the children and other rebels soon are turned into overlarge paperweights.

Huh, well, that won’t sell. Let’s try this: We’ll include him, but only after a fashion. So, the children go to meet Aslan and Edmund is rescued. Then Nature Girl comes to claim the traitor, according to ancient law. Aslan, not being a type of Christ, cannot die and be resurrected, so he has to give Edmund back, to fulfill the law. Nature Girl kills Edmund (but he had it coming, after all), and the four thrones are never filled.

No, no. That won’t do. Well, how about this: Nature Girl comes to claim Edmund, and Aslan says, “No, that’s just tough. You can’t have him. I don’t have to honor the law my old man put into Narnia years ago.”–wait, that implies creation. Can’t have that.

Aha!: The Witch, er, Child of Nature, comes for Edmund, and Aslan eats her (So what if it was supposed to be a parley? Getting to eat your enemies during a truce is one of the beauties of situational ethics.). Everybody else lives happily ever after, including the wolves, hags, efreets, etc. who are shown the error of their ways and reintegrated into society. The four children, not satisfied with the concept of “divine right of kings,” hold elections to see who will be the new president of Narnia. Some dwarf, who was never given fair opportunity for advancement in Nature Girl’s regime, gets the job. The kids go back through the wardrobe. Book sales plummet.

The End.

6 thoughts on “Narnia Declawed

  1. narniagirl11

    I love that so much! I don’t know how many times I’ve read it by now. 😀 You truly can’t take all traces of the Bible and Him out of it. Thought it was amusing to see you try. 🙂

  2. Chiara

    Actually, this is not good. First of all, the names are nonsense as biblical/Christian names are not allegory.

    Then, Paganism is not the opposite of religion, if anything monotheistic religion (so, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Baha’ism and Sikhism), but paganism would be polytheistic religion. Also, calling a Witch a Witch (good or evil doesn’t matter) is not a purely Christian custom. Especially if it’s really a witch and not simply a woman that could read.

    That flawed people are not fully evil and vice versa is actually a very Christian point of view, while one being entirely good or bad (at least for humans) is not. In the books it has been made very clear that one is capable of both good and bad and while there are pure white and black powers, humans and other sentient beings are always pictures in shades of grey, albeit some of them lighter and others darker.
    See Edmund, Eustace, Susan, Jill, Digory, etc., etc. It is one of the most important messages of Narnia that while there is true Good and true evil, the sentient being still is able to choose and to develop and to change and to be forgiven.

    As for the resurrection, that’s of course true: Because Narnia without Christian motives doesn’t work. However, the definition of “Christian” and “non-Christian” in this point is highly dubious until that part.

    This could have been truly interesting and even funny (like so many other content here) and it is an important topic, as Narnia has to be Christian in allegory and message, but this is a very poor execution of an important and right idea.


Leave a Reply to cor Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *